Economic incentive mechanisms for eco-labelled suppliers in public procurement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20311916Abstract
Over the past decade, public procurement has increasingly been recognized as a strategic tool for promoting
the transition to a green economy. International experience from the OECD, the European Union, Japan, and South Korea
demonstrates that eco-labeling and targeted institutional incentives significantly enhance the environmental effectiveness
of public procurement. In Uzbekistan, reforms implemented between 2019 and 2023 have laid the initial legal and strategic
foundations for green public procurement. However, the application of environmental criteria remains largely voluntary,
and institutional mechanisms require further development.
This study analyzes national reforms in light of international best practices and proposes a set of measures to strengthen
Uzbekistan’s public procurement system. Key recommendations include integrating eco-labeling as a mandatory or
prioritized criterion, providing financial incentives, eliminating additional guarantee requirements for certified participants,
building institutional capacity and establishing monitoring systems to evaluate environmental and economic outcomes.
Implementing these measures is expected to accelerate Uzbekistan’s transition to a sustainable economy, support local
green producers, and optimize long-term socio-economic and ecological benefits.
Keywords
Green Public Procurement, Eco-labeling, Environmental Sustainability, Institutional Incentives, Public Procurement Reform, Sustainable Economy, Uzbekistan, Green Economy Transition, Eco-Certification, Resource Efficiency.References
OECD. (2022). Green Public Procurement in OECD Countries: Policies and Practices. OECD Publishing.
European Commission. (2021). EU Ecolabel and Green Public Procurement Criteria. Brussels: European Union.
Government of South Korea. (2018). Green Product Certification and Public Procurement Guidelines. Seoul: Ministry
of Environment, South Korea.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2020). Sustainable Procurement and Federal Green
Purchasing Programs. Washington, DC: EPA.
Government of Canada. (2020). Green Procurement Policy and Guidelines. Ottawa: Public Services and Procurement
Canada.
Batten, S., Sowerbutts, R., & Tanaka, M. (2016). Let’s talk about the weather: The impact of climate change on central
banks. Bank of England Staff Working Paper No. 603. 8. Dorfleitner, G., Utz, S., Wimmer, M., & Zhang, R. (2021).
Environmental, social, and governance factors and bank performance: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Banking
& Finance, 129, 106-123. 9. Priya, R., et al. (2023). AI-enabled customer analytics and decision-making in retail:
Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Retail and Environmental Management (IJSREM),
(3), 45–62.
Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). Resolution on measures to improve the support system
for green public procurement (No. 371). 11. Ministry of Economic Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2021).
National Strategy for Transition to a Green Economy 2019–2030. Tashkent: Government of Uzbekistan. 12. Uzbekistan
National Agency Publications. (2023). Implementation of green criteria in public procurement. Tashkent: UZA News
Agency. 13. Climate Policy Initiative (CPI). (2023). Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2011–2022. CPI Reports. 14.
EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation. (2020). Eco-labeling and sustainable public procurement: Case studies
from Japan and EU. Brussels / Tokyo: EU-Japan Centre.

