IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF LENDING PRACTICES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS

Authors

  • Turdiev Eralijon Mukhtarovich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21945234

Abstract

The methodological foundations for assessing the efficiency of lending practices in commercial banks are
examined with a focus on their further improvement. It is demonstrated that the prevailing assessment practice, which
relies on a limited set of profitability indicators, does not fully capture the multidimensional nature of lending activities
and, consequently, may not provide sufficiently accurate signals for managerial decision-making. A four-block integral
methodology is proposed, encompassing lending profitability, credit risk quality, resource and organisational parameters,
and the structural and innovative characteristics of the loan portfolio. The methodology combines normalisation relative
to normative values, an expert–entropy procedure for determining weights, aggregation of indicators into a single integral
index, and verification of the results through regression analysis and scenario forecasting. Testing the methodology using
data from “Asakabank” JSC for 2021–2025 demonstrates that the integral lending efficiency index increased from 0.605
to 0.883, with the structural–innovative and credit risk quality blocks making the most significant contributions. Under the
baseline scenario, the integral index is projected to reach 0.951 by 2028. The proposed methodology can be applied by
commercial banks for internal analysis and by supervisory authorities for comparative assessment

Keywords

commercial bank, lending practice, efficiency assessment, integral index, methodological foundations, credit risk, non-performing loans, cost-to-income ratio, digital lending, loan portfolio, scenario forecasting

Author Biography

Turdiev Eralijon Mukhtarovich

Tashkent State University of Economics
Independent Researcher

References

Sealey C. W., Lindley J. T. Inputs, Outputs, and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions //

The Journal of Finance. — 1977. — Vol. 32, No. 4. — P. 1251–1266.

Farrell M. J. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A. — 1957.

— Vol. 120, No. 3. — P. 253–290.

Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units // European Journal of

Operational Research. — 1978. — Vol. 2, No. 6. — P. 429–444.

Aigner D., Lovell C. A. K., Schmidt P. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models //

Journal of Econometrics. — 1977. — Vol. 6, No. 1. — P. 21–37.

Battese G. E., Coelli T. J. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for

Panel Data // Empirical Economics. — 1995. — Vol. 20. — P. 325–332.

Berger A. N., Humphrey D. B. Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future

Research // European Journal of Operational Research. — 1997. — Vol. 98, No. 2. — P. 175–212.

Berger A. N., DeYoung R. Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks // Journal of Banking & Finance.

— 1997. — Vol. 21, No. 6. — P. 849–870.

Fiordelisi F., Marques-Ibanez D., Molyneux P. Efficiency and Risk in European Banking // Journal of Banking & Finance.

— 2011. — Vol. 35, No. 5. — P. 1315–1326.

Altman E. I. Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy // The Journal of

Finance. — 1968. — Vol. 23, No. 4. — P. 589–609.

Merton R. C. On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates // The Journal of Finance. — 1974.

— Vol. 29, No. 2. — P. 449–470.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III: Finalising Post-Crisis Reforms. — Basel: Bank for International

Settlements, 2017. — 162 p.

International Financial Reporting Standard 9 “Financial Instruments”. — London: IFRS Foundation, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Turdiev , E. (2026). IMPROVING THE METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF LENDING PRACTICES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS. Innovation Science and Technology, 2(8), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21945234
Vol. 2 No. 8 (2026): Innovation Science and Technology